Material World
We contend that “waste” is the political other of capitalist “value”, repeated with difference as part of capital’s spatial histories of surplus accumulation. We trace its work on India through a series of historical cuts, and suggest that the travels and perils of waste give us a “minor” history of capitalist surplus—the things, places and lives that are cast outside the pale of “value” at particular moments as superfluity, excess, or detritus; only to return at times in unexpected ways. The neologism “eviscerating urbanism” becomes our diagnostic tool to investigate both urban transformations in metropolitan India and their associated architectures for managing bodies and spaces designated as “wasteful”. In sum, our essay reveals how “waste” begins as civil society’s literal and figurative frontier only to become its internal and mobile limit in the contemporary era—a renewing source of jeopardy to urban life and economy, but also, in the banal violence and ironies of fin de millennium urbanism, a fiercely contested frontier of surplus value production.

Capitalism and Socio-Spatial Dialectics of ‘Waste’ « Discard Studies (via chaosbureau)

I’m currently re-reading the Ethics of Waste, which circles around these links between consumer capitalism’s dependence on material waste,the social categorization of ‘surplus’ people as also waste/disposable and the historical attachments or discontents of these groups with western liberalism.

EoW is more interested in how definitions of waste influence materially wasteful or sustainable behaviours, from those who can afford to be wasteful.

It’s good at that, but my interest is more in the limits of positive fetishization of those disposable people who - contrary to media stereotypes - still constitute a majority in the global network of people really labouring* in sustainability initiatives, as opposed to the more visible ‘greens/eco warriors’ who are lifestyle branding them for eco-consumerism.

*typically unpaid and/or at cost/debt creating voluntary labours, from people  whose ‘day jobs’ are for more often in the various forms of working poor/underclass, social limbo demographics than is ever acknowledged by green media or their critics.